Elevator engineering design is a crucial aspect that should be considered equally as other building services. It is important to understand the significance of elevator engineering in ensuring the safety and comfort of occupants in a building.
I remember visiting one of the renowned university architecture engineering departments in Lahore, which was an 11-floor building. Most of the floors were occupied with classrooms and lab areas, with a few professor rooms as well. It was around 11:00 AM during the day, and I noticed that many female students were waiting in line for the single elevator in the building. They realized that I wasn’t a student and courteously allowed me to enter the elevator first. However, it was quite embarrassing to stand inside the crowded elevator, trying my best to avoid touching other passengers, which was almost impossible. I wondered why there was only one elevator and why its capacity was only around 630 Kg-800 Kg.
Many buildings in Pakistan face the dilemma of not having proper elevator designs. In developed countries, architects typically decide the elevator capacity and quantity based on the building’s functionality and usage. Unfortunately, the education system for architects in Pakistan doesn’t prioritize this aspect of building design. Instead, architecture students focus primarily on innovating building outlooks rather than understanding the details of a building’s interior requirements, such as elevator design. MEP design is often overlooked, with no one taking responsibility for it. Mechanical, electrical, and civil engineers may study it as an additional subject, but there are hardly any MS in building services/MEP programs in Pakistani universities. Additionally, there is no BS in Building services programs anywhere in Pakistan.
MEP Design comprises mechanical (HVAC, Ventilation, Smoke Ventilation, Elevators, Fire Fighting), electrical (Distribution, Lighting), plumbing, and BMS (Building Management System) works. In Middle Eastern countries, an experienced MEP designer is expected to design all these services, whereas in the US/Western developed countries, each design is made separately by experts in that field, such as an HVAC Engineer, Fire Fighting Engineer, or Distribution Engineer. The basic education requirement is also different for each specialty. Mechanical specialties are designed by Mechanical Engineers, Distribution and lighting by electrical engineers, and plumbing is usually designed by Civil Engineers or sometimes Mechanical Engineers as environmental and public health experts. Building Management Systems are designed by experts from an IT background.
In my personal opinion, each of these fields is so diverse that one cannot be an expert in all services in one lifetime. It is not advisable to handle multiple services by one person only. Moreover, each specialty requires R&D work in Pakistan to formulate standards and design requirements as per our environmental, social, or budget needs. Unfortunately, there is no single institute in Pakistan working on these subjects. Designers are forced to rely on US/Western countries’ standards like ASHRAE, NFPA, or IEEE standards designed for their respective regions, but not for Pakistan. This situation of zero R&D and improper design knowledge not only cultivates a poor design culture but also tends to waste a lot of money and energy in the shape of over-designing these services.
In terms of elevator design in Pakistan, there are a few challenges that can lead to a worst-case scenario. Firstly, there is often no background engineering study done for any specialty at the graduate or post-graduate level. Additionally, there is no specific specialty that takes responsibility for elevator design, and there is limited information available about its design in the Pakistani market. Due to space limitations and initial costs, elevators cannot be overdesigned like other MEP components, and this can lead to further complications. The cost of elevator design is also often quite high because many parts need to be procured from the international market.
Elevator is the integration of different mechanical, electrical, and electronic components. The design inefficiency is one aspect that leads to poor elevator operation in the shape of availability for users in many buildings in Pakistan. There are many other dilemmas which are associated with elevators. One aspect is poor Operation and maintenance. In most of the hospital buildings in the Public sector in Federal or Punjab areas, the availability of elevators in hospital buildings is less than 20-30 % all around the years due to maintenance issues. An elevator is a moving machine that needs experienced staff, spare parts inventory, and quick and effective after-sale service from a manufacturer representative in Pakistan. Unfortunately, we never pay attention to any of these requirements which not only affect the satisfactory operation of the elevator but also compromise the safety of passengers. Several accidents have been observed in Pakistan in the last few years due to poor operation and maintenance issues.
Elevators need Traffic Analysis as the first step before any further design to correctly design size, speed, and quantities of elevators. Different traffic analysis software is available online. The passenger mustn’t wait more than the desired time as well as elevator should not be idle for most of the time. Traffic Analysis software or even simple Traffic analysis Calculation design elevator parameters according to project usage and the of passengers in use at different times of the day as well as considering the height of the building to reduce passenger waiting time. These all parameters easily be decided with the help of this software. The relevant Architect or MEP engineer must decide on quantities and sizes at the time of concept design to set the minimum space at concept/coordination time. High-rise buildings which are very less in Pakistan at the moment need more in-depth analysis with multiple configurations of elevators like the designation of each elevator or group of elevators separately to certain floors as per project requirements. There are a number of design requirements and an elevator engineer who is very specialized in his field needs to be involved for at least high rise buildings before the finalization of these parameters. As a simple rule, I recommend all Clients to always ask their Architect for Average Waiting Time (AWT) which shall be in best to be around 40-60 seconds internationally but in Pakistan, we may accept up to 80-100 seconds as well.
The speed of the elevator is very important in buildings, In the US, Middle East, or China where we have no of sky scrappers, the speed of an elevator may go beyond 10 meters/second in many of the buildings, and on average they are using elevators of around 3.5-4.0 meter/second in high rise buildings. The average speed of elevators in Pakistan is 1 meter/second. We have few with the speed of 1.6 meters/second and very few with a speed upto 3.5 meters/second and in my knowledge no lift beyond 3.5 meters/second is installed in Pakistan even though we have many Sky scrappers as well as high-rise buildings in Pakistan in Islamabad, Lahore or Karachi. Speed matters for quick operation in high-rise buildings and we shall decide our project speed with the consultation of architects and lift engineers. High-speed elevators also pose more maintenance than normal speed elevators and their cost are slightly higher than normal-speed elevators. However quantities of elevators may also reduce with a selection of high-speed elevators as per engineering calculations.
When designing an elevator, it’s crucial to determine its capacity beforehand. A traffic analysis can help determine the individual elevator capacity, measured in kilograms. The capacity options typically range from 450kg to 2000kg, while cargo elevators can handle up to 5000kg. Commercial elevators should not be less than 800kg, and hospital elevators should not be less than 1600kg to accommodate beds. Keep in mind that the average weight of a person is 75kg, so you can calculate the number of people the elevator can hold based on its capacity.
The process of designing elevators involves selecting the right quantities, speed, and size of the elevator. The elevator engineer needs to finalize the elevator source, installation techniques, and operation and maintenance guidelines. In my experience, the operation and maintenance format is the most crucial aspect to decide even before finalizing the elevator works.
In Pakistan, most elevators are either non-operational or pose safety threats due to poor O&M and the unavailability of spare parts. Therefore, the elevator source needs to be finalized by considering after-sale services and the O&M team’s capability. The elevator should not be procured in isolation. It should be procured with a two-year defect liability period, a one-year warranty, and an inventory of critical elevator spare parts available in Pakistan. Moreover, it should be procured from firms with a good reputation for after-sale service for at least five years with the same offered brand.
Elevator engineers are responsible for predicting energy requirements and designing energy-efficient elevators, which is becoming increasingly important for the design of energy-efficient buildings. In addition, elevator engineers are experts in the design of escalators and travelators, which require almost the same level of design effort as elevators. It is essential to rely on a qualified elevator engineer, who may be an architect, mechanical, or electrical engineer with profound knowledge and experience in elevator engineering, to carry out the design work.
450 km-long new roads worth Rs. 210b to be built in Punjab
Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif announced that three 450 km-long roads will be built in Punjab by December next year to connect different areas with the big cities. “Roads connecting big cities will not only make it easier for the people to travel but would also play an important role in their socio-economic development,” said the chief minister while approving the construction of 03 new road corridors in Punjab in a special meeting. She said that the government will complete these roads at a cost of Rs 210 billion by December 2025 in collaboration with the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Madam chief minister explained that under the project, dual-carriage roads from Sahiwal to Chichawatni, Rajana; from Rajana to Layyah; and from Shorkot to Jhang Chiragwali will be constructed. She added that the single road from Depalpur to Vihari will also be converted into a dual-carriage road. She directed the authorities concerned to start the construction of these new corridors within the next three months. Senator Pervaiz Rashid and Provincial Minister for Construction & Communications Soheb Ahmad Malik attended the meeting. The Chief Secretary, Chairman of P&D, Secretary of Construction & Communications, and other relevant officers were also present.
NESPAK, PMA organize Lahore Transport Week
LAHORE: NESPAK, in collaboration with the Punjab Mass Transit Authority (PMA), is organizing Lahore Transport Week from July 22 to July 31, 2024, under the theme “City on the Move: Now Dreams Take Flight” at NESPAK House, Lahore. This week-long event features consultative sessions and seminars aimed at uniting stakeholders, government departments, and agencies to synergize their efforts under the Committee of Integrated Urban Transport Planning (C-IUTP), established by the government on March 15, 2024.
The event will culminate in a symposium to integrate the findings and recommendations of the experts. Attendees will include government officials, academia, media, citizens, local and international development partners, and other stakeholders.
On the first day, Punjab Minister for Transport & Mass Transit, Mr. Bilal Akbar Khan, was the guest of honor. Other notable speakers included Dr. Ahmed Javed Qazi, Secretary Transport & Mass Transit, Mr. Kanwar Anwaar Ali Khan, Managing Director PMA, Mr. Muhammad Zargham Eshaq Khan, MD NESPAK, Mr. Umar Masood, CEO Urban Unit, Zaid Maqsood, Commissioner Lahore, Ms. Amara Athar, Chief Traffic Officer, and Mr. Shaheryar Chishty, owner of Daewoo Express. National and international experts in urban transport planning also shared their insights on Lahore’s public transport challenges.
The first day’s theme was “Uncovering City’s Insights,” where experts reviewed Lahore’s transport challenges. Mr. Muhammad Zargham Eshaq Khan, MD NESPAK, welcomed the guests and emphasized the need for a strategic approach to public transport issues. Other speakers highlighted the current challenges, including traffic congestion, infrastructural stresses, and inadequacy of public transport. They stressed the importance of joint efforts by all relevant departments for effective solutions and the comprehensive development of Lahore’s master plan. Discussions also covered the evaluation and updating of the Integrated Bus Operations (IBO) network in Lahore. Key topics included urban sprawl, traffic congestion, and environmental sustainability through innovative transport solutions.
Microsoft mulls restricting third-party access to Windows kernel after Crowd Strike outage
Following the “worst IT outage in history” caused by a faulty CrowdStrike update that affected 8.5 million PCs, Microsoft is advocating for changes to enhance Windows’ resilience and is considering restricting security vendors’ access to the Windows kernel.
The Redmond tech giant says in a new incident response post that ways to prevent future similar outages are for vendors to minimize the use of kernel mode and for customers to fully use the integrated Windows security features.
The outage was triggered by a faulty update to CrowdStrike’s CSagent.sys driver, which led to memory access violations and system boot loops. Microsoft’s analysis confirms CrowdStrike’s findings, saying that that kernel-mode drivers while providing crucial system visibility and tamper resistance, can cause significant issues if errors occur.
The company is also considering restricting third-party access to the Windows kernel, which is the core of the operating system, to prevent similar issues in the future. A similar attempt was made during Windows Vista days back in 2006, but it fell through due to criticism from cybersecurity vendors and EU regulators.
In another blog post, Microsoft also urges resiliency in the Windows ecosystem.
Microsoft has mobilized over 5,000 support engineers and is sharing updates on their Windows release health dashboard. They advise businesses to have solid plans for continuity and incident response, back up data regularly, quickly restore devices, use safe update practices, and consider cloud management solutions.
The company also says that it plans to implement advanced security measures like Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) and zero-trust approaches. Most affected PCs are now operational, and Microsoft aims to improve system resilience going forward.
On the morning of July 17th, 2024, the tech world woke up to chaos. What started as a routine update from CrowdStrike, one of the biggest names in cybersecurity, quickly spiraled into a significant Windows outage. The ripple effects of this incident were felt across the globe, affecting millions of users and businesses. CrowdStrike, renowned for its cutting-edge endpoint detection and response (EDR) and extended detection and response (XDR) solutions, had made a grave error. They sent out an update without proper patch testing, a technical blunder that exposed the vulnerabilities in their processes. This untested update made its way into production, and the results were catastrophic. Immediately, systems began to fail. From IT giants in Silicon Valley to commercial airlines in Europe, and banks in Asia, the impact was widespread. The outage highlighted the fragility of our interconnected digital infrastructure and the critical importance of rigorous testing protocols. The world was left grappling with the fallout, and the question on everyone’s mind was: How could this happen?
CrowdStrike, listed on the NASDAQ with a significant market presence, experienced a sharp decline in its share value following the outage. According to Nasdaq, CrowdStrike’s shares fell by 15% in the immediate aftermath, reflecting the market’s reaction to the disruption caused by the faulty update. The answer lay in a series of oversights. Despite CrowdStrike’s strong market position and reputation, there were glaring gaps in their governance and risk analysis practices.
A Fresh Perspective on PEC Elections 2024
The PEC Elections 2024 are shaping up to be a complex and dynamic contest. The diverse backgrounds of candidates, shifting expectations of the council’s role, and evolving campaign strategies all contribute to a landscape that is likely to produce an outcome with significant implications for the engineering profession in Pakistan. As the election approaches, stakeholders will need to navigate these evolving dynamics carefully to achieve their objectives and influence the future direction of the PEC.
Just two weeks before the Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) Elections 2024, almost all groups of engineers have finalized their panels and kicked off their election campaigns—the exercise that normally would have begun much earlier in the past. Only one group, led by a constructor, was observed hosting meetings mostly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province much earlier, while all others were busy either in parleys with prospective allies or engaged in internal discussions
Interestingly enough, the composition of panels announced by the groups reveals a different story unfolding in the engineering education sector in Pakistan. Over 70 percent of the candidates from the major contesting groups come from academia, whose institutions are ironically experiencing a decline due to a consistent decrease in admissions of engineering students. Equally intriguing is the fact that none of the supreme leaders of these groups come from academia—the category that typically secures them the top position in the council.
With armies of academicians in their ranks, The Engineers Pakistan (TEP), the NEA-PEG Alliance, the Engr. Najeeb-led Development Group, the Pakistan Engineers Forum (PEF), and the United Engineers Pakistan (UEP) are all in the fray. However, none seem to be functioning perfectly as of yet. For instance, TEP has struggled to find a suitable candidate for the post of vice chairman in Sindh; the NEA-PEG campaign in Sindh has yet to gain momentum; PEF, running alone for the second time, has failed to form an alliance despite active engagement with the Waseem-led PEG; and TEP and Najeeb have been unable to secure support from Qadir Shah for the second time.
Additionally, there are deeper issues that cannot be overlooked in this election. One significant issue is the differing perceptions of the ideal PEC. Some groups view the council more as a welfare organization for engineers rather than a regulatory body. Leaders of TEP and PEF believe that resuming their previous initiatives is the only way to set the council on the right path. In contrast, NEA’s ally and current leader, Engr. Waseem Nazir, advocates for macro-level reforms of the council. This perspective is not shared by Qadir Shah and Mukhtiar Shah, who, under Engr. Najeeb Haroon’s leadership, claim superior performance, asserting that no one has performed better than Haroon.
Under this scenario, the election campaigns of the five groups are expected to attract a larger number of engineers to the polling stations this time. An additional factor might be TEP’s extra effort in Punjab, with Jawed Salim Qureshi being the top candidate after a one-term gap. However, the current situation suggests that fewer engineers from the corporate sector are actively engaged, and the contest is likely to be between engineers from public sector organizations and academia.
Another significant factor is that many universities, which typically supported a single group in past elections, are now divided. This division could impact the election results this time.
Interestingly, the two leading groups—TEP and NEA—have struggled to address internal issues in Sindh. TEP has had difficulty forming its panel in the province, and its failure to find a strong candidate for the vice-chairman position is telling. In the NEA-PEG Alliance, Qadir Shah’s team has not succeeded in crafting a comprehensive campaign and is relying on traditional methods to attract voters. In contrast, their ally, Engr. Waseem Nazir, has run a distinctly different campaign in Punjab.