Civil Engineering Contracts in Pakistan and Contemporary Practice -

PAKISTAN

Ramesh Raja, PMP

Abstract
Civil engineering contracts constitute the legal and managerial backbone of infrastructure development. Internationally, contract systems such as FIDIC, NEC, and EJCDC have evolved to address increasing project complexity, risk management, and governance requirements.

In Pakistan, however, contractual practice—particularly in public sector infrastructure and highway development—remains largely dependent on earlier editions of FIDIC, most notably the FIDIC Red Book 1987. This paper examines the concept and evolution of civil engineering contracts, reviews prevailing global contract systems, and critically analyzes contemporary practice in Pakistan with special reference to the National Highway Authority (NHA). The study highlights institutional, procedural, and capacity-related constraints that hinder the adoption of modern contract forms such as FIDIC 2017 and emphasizes the central role of competent and impartial Engineers in effective contract administration. The paper concludes with recommendations aimed at aligning Pakistan’s contract practices with international standards to improve transparency, efficiency, and protection of public funds.

Introduction
Civil engineering projects involve substantial public investment, technical complexity, and long execution periods. Contracts in such projects do not merely define commercial terms; they establish the legal framework for risk allocation, project control, dispute resolution, and accountability. Globally, contract systems have progressively evolved to support efficient project delivery and proactive risk management.
In Pakistan, where infrastructure development is predominantly undertaken by public sector agencies, the effectiveness of civil engineering contracts directly influences project outcomes. Persistent issues such as delays, cost overruns, and arbitration are frequently linked to weaknesses in contractual frameworks and their administration. This paper explores these issues by situating Pakistan’s practice within the broader international context.

Concept of Civil Engineering Contracts
A civil engineering contract is a legally enforceable agreement that defines the rights, obligations, and liabilities of the parties involved—typically the Employer, Contractor, and Engineer or Consultant. Such contracts regulate:
– Scope of work and technical standards
– Time for completion and extensions
– Payment procedures and certification
– Variations, claims, and risk allocation
– Dispute avoidance and resolution mechanisms
By transforming technical documents into enforceable obligations, contracts provide the structure through which engineering works are executed under legal certainty.

Historical Evolution of Construction Contracts
The origins of construction contracts can be traced to ancient civilizations, notably the Code of Hammurabi (circa 1754 BC), which imposed liability on builders for defective works. However, modern standardized civil engineering contracts emerged during the Industrial Revolution, when large-scale public works demanded formal legal frameworks.
The twentieth century witnessed the institutionalization of contract standards through professional bodies. Among these, the establishment of FIDIC (Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils) in 1913 marked a decisive step toward internationally harmonized construction contracts.

International Contract Systems in Contemporary Practice
FIDIC
FIDIC contracts represent the most widely used international standard for civil engineering and infrastructure projects. First issued in 1957, FIDIC forms are now employed across Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Europe, particularly in projects funded by international financial institutions. The 2017 editions introduced a streamlined structure, enhanced clarity, and strengthened mechanisms for dispute avoidance and contract management.
NEC
The New Engineering Contract (NEC), originating in the United Kingdom, emphasizes collaboration, early warning mechanisms, and proactive project management. NEC contracts are increasingly adopted in large infrastructure projects where integrated governance and risk mitigation are priorities.
EJCDC and Other National Forms
In the United States, the EJCDC suite is widely used for municipal infrastructure projects, while several European countries employ national standard forms such as VOB (Germany) and CCAG (France). These systems reflect local legal traditions while incorporating modern contractual principles.

Contract Models in Civil Engineering
Civil engineering contracts may be categorized by pricing mechanisms and allocation of responsibilities. Common models include lump sum, unit rate, and cost-plus contracts, as well as design–bid–build, design–build, EPC/turnkey, and PPP/BOT arrangements. These models are implemented within broader contractual frameworks such as FIDIC or NEC.

Contract Practice in Pakistan
Pakistan’s construction industry primarily relies on FIDIC-based contracts, supplemented by standard bidding documents issued by public sector organizations. Agencies such as WAPDA, provincial irrigation departments, and the National Highway Authority (NHA) extensively employ FIDIC forms.
Notably, NHA continues to use the FIDIC Red Book 1987 (reprinted in 1992). This version comprises 72 clauses and reflects contractual concepts developed over three decades ago. While it has provided familiarity and legal certainty, it no longer aligns with contemporary international standards of contract management.

FIDIC 2017 and the Global Shift
Globally, the FIDIC Red Book 2017 has replaced earlier editions in many jurisdictions. The 2017 version consolidates provisions into 21 streamlined clauses, addresses ambiguities identified in earlier editions, and introduces enhanced procedures for claims, determinations, and dispute avoidance.
The continued reliance on FIDIC 1987 in Pakistan has widened the gap between national practice and global norms, particularly in areas of transparency, proactive contract administration, and risk management.

Institutional and Administrative Challenges
Despite institutional reforms such as e-bidding, e-filing, and ISO certification, NHA continues to face extensive contractor claims and disputes. A significant contributing factor is weak contract administration, often linked to Engineers who lack adequate knowledge of FIDIC provisions or fail to maintain the impartiality required under the contract.
Delayed determinations, inconsistent decisions, and insufficient documentation expose public funds to financial risk and undermine confidence in contractual governance.

The Role of the Engineer in Contract Administration
Under FIDIC contracts, the Engineer occupies a central position, responsible for certifications, evaluations of claims, extensions of time, and determinations. The Engineer must act independently and impartially, maintaining a balance between Employer and Contractor.
Inadequate professional capacity or compromised independence in this role directly contributes to disputes and project inefficiencies. Strengthening this function is therefore critical to improving contract performance.

Governance and Reform Measures
To enhance transparency and technical rigor, the selection of Engineers for major public infrastructure projects should follow a structured and merit-based process. A multi-institutional selection board comprising representatives from the executing agency, Ministry of Communications, Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC), Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA), and Planning Commission would strengthen accountability and public confidence.
Given NHA’s demonstrated commitment to modernization, adoption of FIDIC Red Book 2017 represents a logical and necessary step toward aligning Pakistan’s highway contracts with international best practice.

Way Forward
Civil engineering contracts are fundamental instruments of infrastructure governance. While FIDIC-based contracts have served Pakistan for decades, continued reliance on outdated editions has limited efficiency and contributed to disputes. The international transition toward modern frameworks such as FIDIC 2017 underscores the need for reform.
Adopting updated contract forms, strengthening institutional capacity, and ensuring competent and impartial contract administration are essential for improving project outcomes and safeguarding public resources. Aligning Pakistan’s contract practice with contemporary global standards is not merely a technical requirement but a prerequisite for sustainable infrastructure development.

Engr. Ramesh Raja is a civil engineer and managerial/ planning professional who also contributes as a freelance writer on technical matters. He may be reached at engineer.raja@gmail.com

Read More