Young Engineers Demand Immediate Inquiry Against EPDC Convenor Dr. Qaiser Ali

Multiple test centers reportedly faced malfunctioning computers, repeated internet disruptions, and alleged unchecked use of mobile phones and ear pods. These issues allegedly created an unfair and compromised environment for candidates, raising questions about the integrity of the examination process.

According to available data, Part 1 of the exam recorded a 92% pass rate, whereas Part 2 dropped sharply to only 39%, prompting concerns regarding transparency, uniformity, and the credibility of the evaluation system.

More than 1,070 engineers applied and submitted exam fees; however, the number of successful candidates remained disproportionately low. Members of the engineering community have alleged that the current examination structure appears more focused on revenue collection rather than supporting the professional growth of engineers.

Young engineers stated:

“PEC’s examination system has become outdated and ineffective. Poor management, unchecked mobile usage, and repeated violations of merit have destroyed trust in the institution.”

They further warned that the disappointing results and persistent alleged irregularities may discourage engineers from attempting the exam in the future, ultimately weakening the professional engineering pipeline.

The engineering community holds EPDC Convenor Dr. Qaiser Ali allegedly responsible for the mismanagement reported during the examination. They have urged PEC to:

Initiate an independent inquiry
• Review and upgrade examination systems
• Ensure strict monitoring and transparent procedures
• Implement reforms to restore trust and credibility

Young engineers have emphasized that PEC must take urgent corrective actions to prevent further damage to its reputation and to ensure that future examinations uphold the highest standards of merit and professionalism. – PR

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top